Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Fig. 2

From: Frostbite treatment: a systematic review with meta-analyses

Fig. 2

Meta-analyses of studies comparing thrombolysis and conservative treatment. Mean difference of the salvage rate of the Hennepin Frostbite Score (A) and risk ratio of the amputation probability of a digit at risk (B). The between-study variance τ2 was estimated by means of DerSimonian-Laird (A) and Paule-Mandel (B) methods. P-value refers to the heterogeneity test. I2, heterogeneity statistic; τ2, between-study variance; CI, confidence interval; MD, mean difference; N, numerosity; RR, risk ratio; SD, standard deviation; SR, salvage rate; tPA, tissue plasminogen activator

Back to article page