Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 2 Outcomes of frostbite treated with different modalities in patient cohorts. Treatments are grouped according to the quantification methods. HBOT = Hyperbaric oxygen therapy

From: Frostbite treatment: a systematic review with meta-analyses

Outcome quantified by the Hennepin Score (3 studies) a[9, 24, 31]

  

Treatment

Cases

Tissue salvage rate

Treatment including thrombolysis

78

76%

Treatment without thrombolysis

45

49%

Outcome quantified by the digit salvage rate (10 studies)a[8,9,10, 18, 23, 30, 32, 48,49,50]

  

Treatment

Cases

Digit salvage rate

Treatment including thrombolysis

115

69%

Treatment including iloprost + HBOT

28

98%

Treatment including iloprost

30

85%

Yukon frostbite protocol b

22

80%

Treatment without thrombolysis, iloprost or HBOT

35

48%

Outcome quantified by the phalanges salvage rate (1 study) [26]

  

Treatment

Cases

Phalanges salvage rate

Treatment including thrombolysis

5

87%

Outcome quantified by the amputation rate (7 studies) [29, 51,52,53,54,55,56]

   

Treatment

Cases

No amputation (%)

Amputation (%)

Treatment including thrombolysis

91

64 (70%)

27 (30%)

Treatment including HBOT

22

14 (64%)

8 (36%)

Treatment without thrombolysis and HBOT

364

188 (52%)

176 (48%)

  1. aOne article was included in two tables [9]
  2. bData is represented as outcome of the protocol. [10]