Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.
Skip to main content
Fig. 4 | Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

Fig. 4

From: Non-invasive versus arterial pressure monitoring in the pre-hospital critical care environment: a paired comparison of concurrently recorded measurements

Fig. 4

Bland-Altman plot showing differences for each pair of MAP measurements together with bias (dashed red line) and limits of agreement (solid red line). The horizontal black line would reflect perfect agreement between IBP and NIBP at all blood pressures. As in Fig. 2, the dashed red line slopes upwards, which suggests that the overall bias is towards NIBP overestimating MAP during hypotension and underestimating MAP during hypertension

Back to article page

Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1757-7241