Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of PIs and assigned values in the second survey round and selected indicators for the third round

From: Building a performance measurement framework for telephone triage services in Finland: a consensus-making study based on nominal group technique

Indicators selected for the second-round survey by dimensions

Importance of indicator (0–10 scale)

Relevance of indicator (0–10 scale)

Sensitivity of indicator (0–10 scale)

Indicator selected for third-round survey

Average

Median

Average

Median

Average

Median

Dimension: Service availability

Percentage of answered calls

9.1

8

8.9

8

7.4

7

x

Waiting times (directly answered or callbacks)

9

8

8.9

7

7.4

7

x

Dimension: Patient experience

Professional qualifications and length of work experience

8.9

7

8.6

7

5.8

5

Rejected based on second-round responses

Patient experience

8.5

8

6

7

6.4

6

Indicator replaced in the third round: How does the patient rate the utility of the service

Dimension: Quality and safety

Severity of patient symptoms and urgency of follow-up care needed

9.3

9.5

9.4

9.5

8.2

8

x

Reason for encounter (as ICPC-2)

8.8

8

8.6

7

7.6

7

x

Dimension: The outcome of the telephone triage process

Outcome of the telephone triage assessment process (type and level of the follow-up contact)

8.6

8

8.6

9

7.4

8

x

Review of patient Medical history

7.9

9

8

8

7.8

7

x

Dimension: Costs per case

Production costs and total costs of patient episode

9.3

9.5

9.3

9.5

5.4

5

Indicator replaced in the third round: Production costs per call to the Medical Helpline 116,117

Utilization of medical Helpline service

8.1

8.5

8.1

8.5

7.4

8

Â