Skip to main content

Table 4 Logistic regression model in predicting outcomes in all age groups

From: Trauma outcomes differences in females: a prospective analysis of 76 000 trauma patients in the Asia-Pacific region and the contributing factors

 

aOR

P value

99% CI

In-Hospital Mortality

Age < 50

3.26

< 0.001

2.54, 4.18

Non -penetrating injuries

139.55

< 0.001

110.73, 175.86

Anatomical Location Head

0.53

< 0.001

0.41, 0.68

RR > 20

0.4

< 0.001

0.31, 0.52

GCS 3–8

0.02

< 0.001

0.02, 0.03

ISS 9–15

0.71

0.001

0.55, 0.92

Female

1.24

0.022

0.98, 1.57

Poor GOS at Dischargea

Age < 50

0.40

< 0.001

0.36, 0.44

Penetrating injuries

0.33

< 0.001

0.23, 0.46

Female

0.97

0.003

0.82, 0.99

ISS 9–15

3.68

< 0.001

3.37, 4.03

RR > 20

2.87

< 0.001

2.55, 3.24

GCS 9–12

3.81

< 0.001

3.13, 4.64

Poor mRS at Dischargeb

Age < 50

0.54

< 0.001

0.49, 0.59

Penetrating injuries

0.55

< 0.001

0.42, 0.71

RR > 20

1.59

< 0.001

1.40, 1.80

Female

0.98

0.593

0.90, 1.07

GCS 13–15

0.13

< 0.001

0.11, 0.16

ISS 16–25

3.97

< 0.001

3.50, 4.50

ISS 9–15

5.35

< 0.001

4.90, 5.84

GCS 9–12

0.37

< 0.001

0.28, 0.49

  1. GOS, Glasgow Outcome Scale; MRS, Modified Rankin’s Scale; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; RR, Respiratory Rate; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; ISS, Injury Severity Score; aOR, adjusted Odds Ratio
  2. a Defined as GOS score of 2–3
  3. b Defined as mRS score of 4–5