Return to work after major trauma: a systematic review

Table 6 Grouping of factors according to ICF

Domain	Factors	Study ID
Personal factors	Age	Gabbe [33]; Haas [35]; Holtslag [13]; Kivioja [36]; Simmel [31]; Soberg [30]; Vles [34]^;
Personal factors	Sex	Haas [35]; Soberg [30];
Body function & structure	ISS	Gross [32]; Holtslag [13]; Kivioja [36]; Soberg [30]; Vles [34];
	NISS	Soberg [30]
	Extremity injury	Soberg [30]; Vles [34]
	Head injury	Haas [34]; Holtslag [13]; Kivioja [36]; Soberg [30]; Vles [34]
	Abdominal injury	Vles [34]
	Thorax injury	Vles [34]
	Spinal injury	Holtslag [13]; Soberg [30]; Vles [34]
	Number of body areas with injury	Vles [34]
	General health status	Simmel [31]
	FIM motor score	Gabbe [43]
	Head injury Symptom Checklist without anxiety	Holtslag [13]
	Co-morbidity	Holtslag [13]
Participation & activity	Physical fitness	Kivioja [36]
	Physical functioning	Soberg [30]
	Groningen Activity Restriction Scale	Holtslag [13]
	Nottingham Health Profile	Gross [32]
	Percentage of permanent impairment (AMA)	Holtslag [13]
	Educational level	Gross [32]; Soberg [30];
	Social function	Soberg [30]
	Powerful other locus of health control	Soberg[30]
Environmental factors	Low preinjury income	Haas [35]
	Time in ER	Gross [32]
	Mean nurse per day and per patient ratio	Gross [32]
	Compensable status	Gabbe [43]
	Profession	Soberg [30]
Not identifiable via ICF	ICU stay / Length of stay ICU	Haas [35]; Holtslag [13]; Simmel [31]
	LOS hospital	Haas [35]; Holtslag [13]
	Mechanical ventilation	Haas [35];
	Discharge destination	Gabbe [43]; Holtslag [13]
	Time between hospital discharge and FU	Simmel [31]

AMA, American medical association; ER, emergency room; FIM, functional independency measurement; FU, follow up; ICF, International classification of functioning, disability and health; ICU, intensive care unit; LOS, length of stay

ISSN: 1757-7241