Skip to main content

Table 5 The identified factors organised with their most reported key theme and type

From: Factors influencing the pre-hospital management of civilian burn mass casualty incidents in the 21st century: a scoping review

Key theme

Identified factor

Type (n)

Command

Coordination and/or allocation

Satisfactory (n = 7), Unsatisfactory (n = 9)

Command

General command function

Effective (n = 1), Ineffective (n = 4),

Satisfactory (n = 5), Lack of (n = 4)

Command

On-scene medical commander

Lack of (n = 4)

Command

On-scene triage coordination

Satisfactory (n = 4), Unsatisfactory (n = 2), Lack of (n = 3)

Communication

Communication on-scene

Satisfactory (n = 5), Unsatisfactory (n = 10)

Communication

Communication devices

Satisfactory (n = 1), Incompatible (n = 5), Lack of (n = 2)

Communication

Communication network

Stability (n = 1), Overload (n = 6),

Failure (n = 8)

Communication

Communication to patients

Satisfactory (n = 1)

Communication

Information provided to receiving hospitals

Adequate (n = 2), Unsatisfactory (n = 4), Lack of (n = 3)

Communication

Inter-agency communication

Satisfactory (n = 1), Unsatisfactory (n = 7), Lack of (n = 3)

Communication

Public informing

Effective (n = 2), Ineffective (n = 1),

Hampering (n = 1)

Communication

Public warning system

Lack of (n = 1)

Communication

Transparent crisis communication

(n = 1)

Contextual

Blocked emergency egress

(n = 2)

Contextual

Challenging accident site

(n = 7)

Contextual

Chaos at scene

(n = 6)

Contextual

Hindered access to or from site

(n = 9)

Contextual

Immediate self or bystander care

(n = 2)

Contextual

Induced panic in victims

(n = 1)

Contextual

Loss of electricity

(n = 3)

Contextual

Operational disruption

(n = 8)

Contextual

Patient characteristics

(n = 5)

Contextual

Patient charting

Adherent (n = 1),

Deviation from (n = 3)

Contextual

Type of fire

Intense (n = 1), Rapid (n = 2)

Education

CBRNE-training

Insufficient (n = 2), Lack of (n = 3)

Education

Decontamination

Insufficient (n = 2), Lack of (n = 2)

Education

General training

Sufficient (n = 3), Insufficient (n = 6), Non-compliance (n = 1), Lack of (n = 6)

Environment

Time of day

Daytime (n = 1), Night-time (n = 4)

Environment

Weather

Good (n = 1), Bad (n = 3), Cold (n = 5)

Evacuation

Evacuation of patients

Timely (n = 2), Delayed (n = 5), Hampered (n = 4), Impossible (n = 1)

Evacuation

Evacuation of the dead

(n = 2)

Evacuation

Self or bystander evacuation

(n = 14)

Evacuation

Varied non-medical transport methods to hospital

(n = 17)

Fortuity

Good luck

(n = 3)

Human factors

Affected emergency response due to judgement errors

Compromised (n = 1)

Human factors

Attitude of rescuers

Poor (n = 1)

Human factors

Emergency response efficiency due to role switching

Secured (n = 1), Compromised (n = 2)

Human factors

Evacuation recommendation

Non-compliance (n = 1)

Human factors

Response to warning signs by victims

Inadequate (n = 1)

Preparedness

Activation of emergency response

Rapid (n = 6), Delayed (n = 3)

Preparedness

Activation of MCI/disaster plan

Rapid or immediate (n = 6),

Delayed (n = 1)

Preparedness

Arrival on-scene

Delayed (n = 3)

Preparedness

Emergency response

Rapid (n = 16), Scalable (n = 9), Delayed (n = 13), Effective (n = 5), Lack of (n = 4)

Preparedness

Equipment

Inappropriate or inadequate (n = 4), Malfunctioning (n = 5),

Lack of (n = 3)

Preparedness

Following the MCI/disaster plan

Compliance (n = 4),

Non-compliance (n = 2)

Preparedness

MCI/disaster plan

Effective (n = 5), Incomplete (n = 9), Lack of (n = 1)

Preparedness

Medical treatment

Sufficient (n = 2), Insufficient (n = 2), Lack of (n = 1)

Preparedness

Number of medical personnel

Sufficient (n = 3), Insufficient (n = 3)

Preparedness

Number of medical supplies

Insufficient (n = 6)

Preparedness

Number of responding emergency services

Insufficient (n = 9), Sufficient (n = 8)

Preparedness

Operation procedures, protocols, or plans

Practical (n = 1), Impractical (n = 2), Non-compliance (n = 1)

Preparedness

Protective gear for rescue personnel

Inappropriate or inadequate (n = 3)

Preparedness

Rescue efforts

Effective (n = 3)

Preparedness

Resource on-scene

Insufficient (n = 1), Lack of (n = 1)

Preparedness

Resuscitation

Lack of (n = 2)

Response tactics

Response strategy

“Load and go” (n = 5), “Stay and play” (n = 1)

Response tactics

Ad-hoc solution

Emergency shelter (n = 4), Triage area (n = 3), Medical treatment (n = 2), Ambulance overload strategy (n = 2), Communication enhancement (n = 1), Field hospital (n = 1), Triage criteria (n = 1)

Response tactics

Field hospital/medical station

Use of (n = 4), Lack of (n = 1)

Response tactics

Self-induced emergency vehicle ingress-egress congestion

(n = 3)

Safety

Illegal overcrowding

(n = 2)

Safety

Interference with medical procedures by bystanders

(n = 1)

Safety

Safety regulations

Non-compliance (n = 3)

Safety

Scene control

Sufficient (n = 4), Insufficient (n = 6)

Safety

Situational awareness

Insufficient (n = 2), Lack of (n = 3)

Safety

Venue location

Inappropriate use (n = 2)

Safety

Violence inflicted on emergency personnel

Verbal (n = 2), Physical (n = 1)

Triage

Triage

Satisfactory or correct (n = 9), Unsatisfactory or incorrect (n = 8), Not performed (n = 3), Rapid (n = 2)

Triage

Triage protocol

Adherence to (n = 2), Deviation from (n = 8), Lack of (n = 1)

Triage

TBSA estimation on-scene

Unsuccessful (n = 2)

Volunteer

Bystander, community or volunteer rescue efforts

(n = 12)

Volunteer

Professional volunteer response

Coordinated (n = 2),

Uncoordinated (n = 2)

  1. Table 5 presents the 71 identified factors in the middle column, alongside their most reported key theme in the left column and their type and frequency (n) in the right column. As shown in the right column, the type of factor varies; some are neutral, indicating only frequency, while others are classified as either positive or negative, such as effective or ineffective, or descriptive attributes such as rapid, poor, or adequate for example. If two or more papers reported the same factor from the same incident, the count was adjusted to ensure that it was recorded only once as a unique identified factor